Ansar is not original author and I've made a much better page that utilises CFC SL HERE.
Is over in the legacy CFC collection so I guess just link to the fantasy download page there unless you plan to go ahead with merge. Change download to link to the thread I guess but the actual file is located offsite which is a worry though. Actually recently found this one on the forums in THIS THREAD too. Maybe change the download link to just link to that page as that's what I've done with other SL scenarios in the CFC download resource area as the SL is on CFC's servers so no point uploading a duplicate file wasting space. Yup Ansar did some cataloging/rescuing work similar to what I'm doing now except he did some weird linking to the old downloads area that sometimes worked and sometimes didn't and he didn't always put author name which was bad form. It's a shame as it's very cool and he a put huge amount of work into that scenario & modpack as it has all these cool Civ1 graphics and clever features modded in yet he gives it name that no one will probably click on because they think its just some map thing lol! Also please note it's definitely a MGE era scenario mod. Every time I see it I think "why did Klej call it that?" I mean I know technically why as the scenario uses a small map but yeah soooo not a good name lol. Tested - Definitely ToT, but doesn't appear to be ToTPP so not sure why it fails your version checker. Tested - Definitely ToT, is specially designed for ToTPP. Tested - Definitely MGE era, will not load in ToT, Ansar mislabeled. Maybe Garfield has some thoughts on that.
#Planet centauri download v0.10.1b Patch#
Speaking of ToTPP I suspect from some of the below cases that the specially designed ToT Patch Project scenarios are messing with your version checker. The legacy download section will be more lost than ever if no one can get to it from the front page anymore.
#Planet centauri download v0.10.1b update#
Although if you don't do it then you'd need to go update the drop down menu again as I noticed you've removed the legacy download link entirely from it. I doubt anyone would hold it against you for leaving as is as it was not part of the original scope of the job request. Yeah it's a real mess and some of those duplicates would be in completely different looking zip files too. In several cases where I created an entry in the downloads section for a modern day project I just linked to the authors thread in case of file updates. Yeah we can just create a entry in the resource downloads section that links to NamelessOne's thread since downloads section supports external link instead of attached files.
0 kommentar(er)
